Spring 2026 Notes: Classroom, Assessments, and the AI Era

This post is a high-level snapshot of what we have been building toward lately, written for educators, candidates, and hiring teams who want the same outcome, measurable skill growth without hostile UX.

Classroom (fewer sharp edges)

Live sessions keep improving when small details are right, like reconnections on flaky Wi-Fi, countdowns that everyone trusts, and question mixes that support both classic coding and lighter-weight puzzles when the lesson calls for it.

We also care about anonymous guests having a clean path to participate without breaking roster integrity.

Assessments (clearer stories for non-technical reviewers)

Hiring workflows work better when recruiters can run a consistent pipeline: structured prompts, defaults that match role level, and review surfaces that highlight signal instead of noise.

Accessibility and themes

Practice is for everyone. Polishing light mode, contrast, and navigation consistency is not cosmetic. It determines whether students can actually finish a session at the end of a long day.

Courses that meet students where they are

We are excited about curricula that treat prompting and AI fluency as first-class engineering skills, not a footnote, while still grounding people in algorithms and systems thinking.

What we want from you

Tell us which failure mode you see most:

We read feedback like bug reports: the more specific, the faster it turns into a fix.

Pick your lane on [Practice](/practice), [Classroom](/classroom), or the [assessments product page](/product/assessments) depending on whether you are learning, teaching, or hiring.